3 ms·
She's got a good point; I'd take the same stance on the word "startup". I see a lot of statements here like "take a look at my startup!" with a link to a little
by sabat 16y ago
She's got a good point; I'd take the same stance on the word "startup". I see a lot of statements here like "take a look at my startup!" with a link to a little webapp that's brand new and either has no revenue model or no customers.
I wonder if Jolie is going too far in creating a strict definition -- many side projects have made people into true entrepreneurs. Is Patio11 an entrepreneur? Absolutely. And he was when he was selling Bingo Card Creator while still working as a Japanese salaryman.
Many entrepreneurs do indeed "go through hell" to succeed. But correlation != causation; you don't have to go through hell, angel rounds, funding rounds, or huge public launches to qualify as an entrepreneur. Peldi is an entrepreneur -- one hell of an entrepreneur if you ask me.
There certainly is a limit to the legitimate use of this word, I agree. The bar is probably a bit lower than Jolie suggests, though.
- mgkimsal 16y agore: patio11 - while he met one of her negative criteria (working for someone else) - he met the other positive ones - had a product he was selling. I'd suggest that meeting the positive criteria can generally outweigh some of the negative ones. The difference would be working for someone else, coming home, spending a lot of evenings on a web-app, and saying you're an entrepreneur. In the web-app space, I wouldn't consider someone an entrepreneur who had no working web-app, or had one with no paying customers and/or revenue stream.