4 ms·

Surveillance cameras are already in most infant's rooms and even sometimes cribs.

• huehehue 7y ago
  That's a bit of a special case. Infants don't understand the concept of privacy, and you're not ruining a baby's future childhood by keeping an eye on their breathing via private video feed. You can't really educate an infant into not spontaneously dying so they sort of need constant surveillance until they can think and speak on their own.
  • fhbdukfrh 7y ago
    So you think SIDS can be effectively addressed by continuous visual monitoring? Do you remotely monitor their vitals as well? I debate your point that you are not running their future; you're setting up the foundation for both parent and child that this is normal and to be expected. Also the assumption of privacy is tenuous given this experience and all the other terrible IoT implementations that have come to light
  • noarchy 7y ago
    >Infants don't understand the concept of privacy I'm not sure this is limited to infants, though I realize it isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. People don't realize how they're being tracked by the devices they carry around, or the kinds of data they're willingly giving up. And even if it is explained, it doesn't seem to sink in that there is a wide-open window into their lives through which certain entities can easily peer.
• drugme 7y ago
  Surveillance cameras are already in most infant's rooms Do you know this is true? Or do you just... "think" it's true?
  • djsumdog 7y ago
    I think this poster is talking about baby monitors. The new ones let you view your kids from any phone or tablet on your account. With many of these devices, that image/audio gets sent to a remote server and then back to your house. Very few keep this information on your local network even if both devices are on the same Wi-Fi. That is very troubling.