5 ms·
Yes. It doesn't get as much publicity so few know about it. That's the problem with today's bias, and muting one side.
by firemancoder 7y ago
Yes.
It doesn't get as much publicity so few know about it. That's the problem with today's bias, and muting one side.
- AWildC182 7y agoSaying yes and rambling about media bias doesn't forward the conversation at all. You have to at least provide examples...
- firemancoder 7y agoAs others have mentioned, the Las Vegas shooter is one recent example. Congressman being shot down on a baseball field. Dismissing facts by calling it "rambling" doesn't make it any less true.
- AWildC182 7y agoThen what do you intend to contribute by just saying yes? The congressman is a totally fair example IMO, even though he's technically not in the scope of my question. He was thoroughly covered in the news, however. Las Vegas isn't really a good example in my mind as I haven't seen any credible sources indicating it was a left wing attack or otherwise politically motivated. Either way, he too was obviously covered by the media.
- firemancoder 7y agoYou asked a question, and I gave you the answer. If you choose the believe the far left is harmless and has never killed/hurt anyone, there's nothing I can do to stop you. Enjoy your day.
- tomjakubowski 7y agoActually, you purposely spread a baseless lie about the politics of the Vegas shooter.
- iron0013 7y agothe Las Vegas shooter is one recent example. You are repeating a lie, and I think you know it.