I think the point the article was trying to make was that what the CEO tried is classically delusioned thought processes from a rich privileged person. His busi

I think the point the article was trying to make was that what the CEO tried is classically delusioned thought processes from a rich privileged person. His business experience was not applicable to the situation but he thought it was. And it's people like him, and his broader political views, that are stymieing the things that have been shown to work. It's negative because it's tiresome. Will these people ever realize that their time, money, and lobbying are better put towards programs that work?