3 ms·
I'm sorry, I'm not following your description. Saying there is a quantitative strength to a relationship is, to a regular person, meaningless. Am I .56 in love
by ordinaryperson 8y ago
I'm sorry, I'm not following your description.
Saying there is a quantitative strength to a relationship is, to a regular person, meaningless. Am I .56 in love with my wife?
Can I fit in a straight line to her?
These are not good descriptions. Of course HN is full of data scientists who wildly object to oversimplifying statistical relationships -- luckily you are here to give the detailed mathematical context. But these are not simplified descriptions for a general audience.
- dragonwriter 8y ago> Saying there is a quantitative strength to a relationship is, to a regular person, meaningless. That the average person would not understand a particular accurate description of a subject does not, in and of itself, make a completely inaccurate alternative description less wrong or even a good simplification.
- ordinaryperson 8y ago"less wrong" -- as if what's important is a gradient of "wrongness" and just helping the average person understand stuff without technical jargon.