Panic co-founder Cabel Sasser endorsed it: https://twitter.com/cabel/status/907395474591703040 https://twitter.com/cabel/status/907395474591703040 (thread) htt

Panic co-founder Cabel Sasser endorsed it: https://twitter.com/cabel/status/907395474591703040 https://twitter.com/cabel/status/907395474591703040 (thread) https://twitter.com/cabel/status/1047883132391682048 https://twitter.com/cabel/status/1047883132391682048 https://twitter.com/cabel/status/1047883847239589889 https://twitter.com/cabel/status/1047883847239589889 I don't give a damn about the person in that incident. I do give a damn about blatant political abuse of the law, particularly by people in our industry who have no excuse for not knowing better. > poison the comment section on such an unrelated development. You don't think ethics of the company's leadership are relevant, in situations involving products that they create or hold copyright or exclusive distribution rights to? Bringing it up is not just distaste for Sasser's politics, but a view into what may happen to users or reviewers of products sold by them. You may decide the risk is extremely low (it probably is) or that you don't care, but it doesn't seem entirely irrelevant to me.