3 ms·
>They were the Ferrari of phones >There's a reason why they were not reviewed widely Coincidentally, Ferrari also play dishonest games with reviewers: https:/
by kurtisc 7y ago
>They were the Ferrari of phones
>There's a reason why they were not reviewed widely
Coincidentally, Ferrari also play dishonest games with reviewers: https://jalopnik.com/how-ferrari-spins-5760248 https://jalopnik.com/how-ferrari-spins-5760248
- mi100hael 7y agoYou could just leave it at > Ferrari also play dishonest https://jalopnik.com/ferrari-admits-to-knowingly-allowing-dealers-to-change-1823368905 https://jalopnik.com/ferrari-admits-to-knowingly-allowing-de...
- LifeLiverTransp 7y agoMachine industry standard parts with ones own - slightly diffrent size and tolerance and sell them for $Orgprice * 10 ?
- mhh__ 7y agoChris Harris (author of the linked article) was also banned from reviewing Lambo's too
- londons_explore 7y agoIt's not only Ferrari. Across the car industry, reviewers are typically given the highest performing and best examples that come off the production line. There is a surprising amount of variability between 'identical' cars.