4 ms·
>This is not what happened. Access to the account provided no additional information, it just would have protected her identity somewhat. doesnt matter; it's s
by ausecpro 7y ago
>This is not what happened. Access to the account provided no additional information, it just would have protected her identity somewhat.
doesnt matter; it's still a CFAA violation. if the facts as they have been presented are correct, assange is guilty of conspiracy.
- boomboomsubban 7y agoIf the facts as presented are correct, ruling Assange's actions as illegal would violate the rights of a free press. Which is why the distinction is important, protecting a source is the duty of the press while trying to acquire additional information is not.