4 ms·
WebObjects, dead? Can you please define "dead"? WebObjects powers the iTunes store. I think it is doing just fine generating billions of dollars/year for Apple.
by lr 16y ago
WebObjects, dead? Can you please define "dead"? WebObjects powers the iTunes store. I think it is doing just fine generating billions of dollars/year for Apple.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- jfb 16y agoI question the asserted numbers. It is a dead technology.
- rimantas 16y agoSo it's the dead technology that powrers #1 music seller in US?
- cubicle67 16y agoI think he means dead as a commercial product, not dead as in no longer used
- vetinari 16y agoYes. There are thousands people in the world speaking Latin, but it is still dead language.
- jfb 16y agoI think I can safely say that I know more about the usage of WebObjects within Apple than (probably) every other poster here, and my knowledge in this area leads to me to one inescapable conclusion: it's a dead technology. HINT: My last job was writing WebObjects software for the aforementioned music store.
- rimantas 16y agoAny hints if Apple intends to replace it with something?