4 ms·
OK I see what you're getting at. Sure, maybe MS is pushing MIT out of sneaky bastardliness. But, it kinda sounds like what you're saying is that as long as it's
by velcrovan 8y ago
OK I see what you're getting at. Sure, maybe MS is pushing MIT out of sneaky bastardliness. But, it kinda sounds like what you're saying is that as long as it's good for the owner it can't also be horrible.
I mean, my auto shop exists to benefit me however I decide is best, and there is a good argument to be made that I benefit from sabotaging my customers' cars. So what!
- teddyh 8y ago> But, it kinda sounds like what you're saying is that as long as it's good for the owner it can't also be horrible. Oh, that explains the downvotes. No, that’s not what I meant. What I was trying to do was to socratically tease out the strangeness of calling something “horrible for GitHub repositories”, as if GitHub repositories had an inherent purpose.