Yes, clearly that is what everyone is saying. :-P Maybe: - Don't deploy a system that has this many false alerts (and that is what even the TSA calls them, th

Yes, clearly that is what everyone is saying. :-P Maybe: - Don't deploy a system that has this many false alerts (and that is what even the TSA calls them, they are not interested in finding dense hair) - Stop continuing to use this stuff and spend money on it if we aren't seeing any benefit, and are seeing demonstrable harm. - Don't replace human judgement with blind procedure that must be followed, when that procedure depends on a known flawed technology that isn't providing any demonstrable benefit. - Accept that even if you want this kind of tech to exist, it isn't there yet, and you aren't going to "fix it in code" by adding a race variable. Bottom line is, nobody is forcing us to use these machines / procedures. We aren't stuck with them and have to figure out some way to patch the code or we're all doomed, so we don't have to be so reductive about how we fix it. We could just say, this was a failed idea and throw it the hell out.