4 ms·
True but its a bit of a problem when your hegemony keeps getting threatened by the latest flavor of the month social network and quarter after quarter your gett
by soup10 8y ago
True but its a bit of a problem when your hegemony keeps getting threatened by the latest flavor of the month social network and quarter after quarter your getting pressured by shareholders to keep increasing advertising revenue.
- zitterbewegung 8y agoBuying a company out is much cheaper than it disrupting you .
- soup10 8y agotrue but future companies are under no obligation to sell and as facebook's reputation goes down the gutter i would say are even not likely
- zitterbewegung 8y agoThe future companies that don’t accept buy outs and are successful are obviously the ones who will beat you .
- rdlecler1 8y agoSnapChat?
- shrisukhani 8y agoTrue but future companies’ decisions to sell will in almost all cases not be based on FB’s reputation - even if it goes down the gutter - than the material terms of the acquisition. And as for those that don’t get acquired, I think we can all take a quick look at Snap’s market performance and bleeding execs. That’s not to say that FB will not be disrupted - everyone eventually is. Just that it doesn’t seem likely to happen anytime in the near future.