3 ms·
That’s wrong. See Section 1017 of the Dodd-Franken act: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/con
by matt4077 7y ago
That’s wrong. See Section 1017 of the Dodd-Franken act: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLAW-111publ203.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ203/html/PLA...
The bureau gets its funding from the Federal Reserve System. What the argument may or may not have been is that fines would exceed operating costs. But they don’t go directly to the bureau, which therefore still needs to finance its operations.
Collected fines do not go into the bureau’s general operating budget, but are supposed to be used for compensating victims or, if that’s not possible, specifically into financial literacy programs. Quote:
“There is
established in the Federal Reserve a separate fund, to be known
as the ``Consumer Financial Civil Penalty Fund'' (referred to in
this section as the ``Civil Penalty Fund''). The Civil Penalty
Fund shall be maintained and established at a Federal reserve
bank, in accordance with such requirements as the Board of
Governors may impose. If the Bureau obtains a civil penalty
against any person in any judicial or administrative action
under Federal consumer financial laws, the Bureau shall deposit
into the Civil Penalty Fund, the amount of the penalty
collected.
(2) Payment to victims.--Amounts in the Civil Penalty Fund
shall be available to the Bureau, without fiscal year
limitation, for payments to the victims of activities for which
civil penalties have been imposed under the Federal consumer
financial laws. To the extent that such victims cannot be
located or such payments are otherwise not practicable, the
Bureau may use such funds for the purpose of consumer education
and financial literacy programs.”