https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bjs.11151 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bjs.11151 Here's a link to the study. Please point

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bjs.11151 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bjs.11151 Here's a link to the study. Please point out the parts of it that you find to be scientifically failing. There's a valid point to be made that the original article implies a greater causal link than the study, but that isn't the study's fault, and it doesn't actually diminish the effect of the checklist in the process. Poor reporting on science is always a problem, and journalists typically use layperson phrasing in order to make the information more consumable.