3 ms·

Well, he is campaigning on KMT ticket. KMT is pro-unification. (Funny considering KMT history, but that's how things played out.)

dis-sys 7y ago
> KMT is pro-unification. No, KMT is not pro-unification. When KMT's ex-chairman Hung Hsiu-chu openly supported the unification during her presidential campaign in 2015, 91% of KMT delegates at the party congress voted for replacing her as the KMT presidential candidate. KMT's plan is always to keep the status quo and use "unification" as a bargaining chip to get more $ from the CCP.
- baybal2 7y ago
  KMT's regular party goers and the leadership are not quite the same, as Hong Xiuzhu found out. KMT has a sizeable, but mute hardliner wing who have no joke ambitions of taking on CPC again
NotPaidToPost 7y ago
Of course the KMT is "pro-unification". That's a historical constant, nothing funny about it. I remember Ma Yingjiu (the previous KMT ROC President) asked about 'independence' in 2011. He replied that the Republic of China had been independent since it was founded in 1911. Very good reply that summarises the situation to those who do not know Chinese history.
- showjackyang 7y ago
  Actually no, KMT was at war with CPC. By unification, KMT meant (notice the past tense here) taking out CPC and rule mainland themselves. This position has changed 180 degrees in recent decades. The unification now KMT is promoting is essentially just give up and let CPC take over. Notice KMT is a foreign political party that originates from mainland China. Taiwanese people never had a say in that (Taiwanese social elites were slaughtered by KMT) before DPP became a real political party that's born and raised in Taiwan. Ma Yingjiu's statement was to maintain KMT's legitimacy as a party in Taiwan, that is, through a country named ROC. However, for Taiwanese. Our country is called Taiwan. And that's how we recognise ourselves long before 1911.
showjackyang 7y ago
Well... IMO "unification" is the wrong term, "invasion" is what China is actually doing.

dis-sys 7y ago

> KMT is pro-unification. No, KMT is not pro-unification. When KMT's ex-chairman Hung Hsiu-chu openly supported the unification during her presidential campaign in 2015, 91% of KMT delegates at the party congress voted for replacing her as the KMT presidential candidate. KMT's plan is always to keep the status quo and use "unification" as a bargaining chip to get more $ from the CCP.

baybal2 7y ago
KMT's regular party goers and the leadership are not quite the same, as Hong Xiuzhu found out. KMT has a sizeable, but mute hardliner wing who have no joke ambitions of taking on CPC again

NotPaidToPost 7y ago

Of course the KMT is "pro-unification". That's a historical constant, nothing funny about it. I remember Ma Yingjiu (the previous KMT ROC President) asked about 'independence' in 2011. He replied that the Republic of China had been independent since it was founded in 1911. Very good reply that summarises the situation to those who do not know Chinese history.

showjackyang 7y ago
Actually no, KMT was at war with CPC. By unification, KMT meant (notice the past tense here) taking out CPC and rule mainland themselves. This position has changed 180 degrees in recent decades. The unification now KMT is promoting is essentially just give up and let CPC take over. Notice KMT is a foreign political party that originates from mainland China. Taiwanese people never had a say in that (Taiwanese social elites were slaughtered by KMT) before DPP became a real political party that's born and raised in Taiwan. Ma Yingjiu's statement was to maintain KMT's legitimacy as a party in Taiwan, that is, through a country named ROC. However, for Taiwanese. Our country is called Taiwan. And that's how we recognise ourselves long before 1911.

showjackyang 7y ago

Well... IMO "unification" is the wrong term, "invasion" is what China is actually doing.