2 ms·
Good question. Conceptually, you can think of a signed exchange as a 301 redirect to a new URL which has already been cached by the browser (so there is no 2nd
by gregable 7y ago
Good question.
Conceptually, you can think of a signed exchange as a 301 redirect to a new URL which has already been cached by the browser (so there is no 2nd network event). The cache was populated by the contents of the signed exchange, assuming the signature validates.
There is no "reaching into the document" from the previous click or anything weird like that.
- Vinnl 7y agoI just wanted to say a quick thank you for going out of your way to answer to many questions here. Despite the obviously hostile environment (I have some reservations about AMP myself), your answers have been very clear, informative and level-headed, so thanks for that.
- gregable 7y agoI appreciate the comment. My goal here is simply to correct some of the misunderstandings about the format, rather than express opinions.