> Convincing people is not a side effect, it is the goal of a post, or of your strong stance. Convincing people is a side effect to me, because I am not gettin

> Convincing people is not a side effect, it is the goal of a post, or of your strong stance. Convincing people is a side effect to me, because I am not getting paid for that. My ability to reason right, on the other hand, helps me to make right technical and business decisions. > people here are not deeply informed on this You are implying that there are some scientific gods and then there are poor "us". The reality is that there are only "us" and these scientific [and pseudo-scientific] gods are just part of us. > Scientists, in reality, welcome well-reasoned criticism. Exactly. That is one of the reasons why I think that what this EHT imaging team is doing is anti-scientific. > Bizarre and ill-argued salvos I asked: ~~~~~~~~~ 19:39 "Calibration Free Imaging" Does it mean that you were using measurements tools (telescopes) without prior calibration? ~~~~~~~~~ What is bizzare about that question?