4 ms·
It's not full scale DotA (limited hero pool makes a huge difference imo) but it's still incredible. Obviously, this limited rule set is not pure DotA, and so t
by SmooL 7y ago
It's not full scale DotA (limited hero pool makes a huge difference imo) but it's still incredible.
Obviously, this limited rule set is not pure DotA, and so the humans we're at a slight disadvantage.
The results of letting anyone play against it will be the huge test - AI often fails to "cheese" strategies, and this will be a good test of whether any exist. I'm excited to see the results.
- asutekku 7y agoThey told they didn’t choose all heroes as the AI was already much better at micromanaging the creeps. Limiting the selection apparently gave humans a better chance to win.
- andreime 7y ago(edited for more info) That's incorrect. Each team has strategies and preferred heroes and OG won the international ( a sort of world championship ) by ignoring trends and sticking to a limited preferred hero pool. Since then, they've been consistent at underperforming vs. other human team. So by limiting the amount of heroes, humans are clearly at a disadvantage. In the last international, from the hero pool, 110 heroes were picked and 98 were banned. The micromanagement claim seems fair when it comes to illusions.