3 ms·
I remember reading a (Golden Age fallacy?) account of the historical university of Nalanda in India, which was an historic Buddhist center of learning. It was n
by contingencies 8y ago
I remember reading a (Golden Age fallacy?) account of the historical university of Nalanda in India, which was an historic Buddhist center of learning. It was not limited to religious and philosophical education, anyone could lecture and anyone could interject. Free board was available for all comers. It grew to become a well known international center of learning, and at least that part is factual. There are parallels in many places (eg. speakers corner in London, Greek and Roman popular history, etc.) but apparently voices and the general public are apparently not scalable. Now we have Youtube.
Amusingly, recently corrupt bureaucrats have attempted to re-instantiate Nalanda. Despite gathering a huge amount of dirty money and land they've only put through a handful of postgrad students, and already have weathered multiple substantive allegations of corruption, sexual harassment, etc.
Perhaps people are the problem.
- WC3w6pXxgGd 8y agoSounds like government bureaucracy is the problem there.
- jaldhar 8y agoNalanda, (and Vikramashila, Odantapura etc.) were Buddhist vihars (monasteries) which have been retconned into “universities” in modern times. Mind you the Western university grew out of Catholic Church institutions so it is not completely far-fetched but there is a lot of wishful thinking involved. Far from letting anyone lecture, an important office in those places was the dvarapala (“gatekeeper”) This was a senior scholar whose job was to examine applicants and only those who passed his tests were allowed inside.