4 ms·
8K doesn't make sense, anywhere. I'm middle-aged, and I can't at 2 meters distinguish 4K from 1080p. Nobody in the world can see the difference between 8K and 4
by wazoox 8y ago
8K doesn't make sense, anywhere. I'm middle-aged, and I can't at 2 meters distinguish 4K from 1080p. Nobody in the world can see the difference between 8K and 4K. It's a shameful waste of resource and ridiculous planned obsolescence.
In fact, it should probably be forbidden for wasting precious resources for no good reason.
- dasloop 8y agoNo matter the screen size?
- whamlastxmas 8y agoHow many people are going to play their PS5 in an IMAX theater?
- debug-desperado 8y agoThe more pixels you throw at font rendering, the better. It also allows for cleaner upscaling from lower resolutions. However, those two uses are needed more on computer monitors, not TVs. You are right that most folks with 50-65" TVs at 2-3 meters don't benefit from anything higher than 1080p.
- F-0X 8y agoExactly. I would prefer they directed their budget somewhere other than graphics for this reason. The switch still plays most games at only 720p I believe, but this is more than sufficient for enjoyable games. I think 4k is a waste of memory, let alone 8k.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 8y agoVR I think?