5 ms·
People keep saying this, but I cannot find proof. The best I can find is a regulatory advisory: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCi
by scottbessler 16y ago
People keep saying this, but I cannot find proof. The best I can find is a regulatory advisory:
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/1acfc3f689769a56862569e70077c9cc/$FILE/ATTBJMAC/ac91-57.pdf http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisor...
- blhack 16y agoCurrent drones fly under FAA part 91: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=3efaad1b0a259d4e48f1150a34d1aa77&rgn=div5&view=text&node=14:2.0.1.3.10&idno=14 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid... Here is where they are talking about drones: http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=6287 http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=62...
- scottbessler 16y ago"Recreational use of the NAS is covered by FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 91-57 which generally limits operations to below 400 feet above ground level and away from airports and air traffic." This is recreational use, and I consistently see people deferring to this "Advisory" circular which specifically states it merely "encourages voluntary compliance"