5 ms·
I've always wondered if we could scale the term of the law with the vote total. For example, lets say your state legislature has 100 representatives. You could
by function_seven 7y ago
I've always wondered if we could scale the term of the law with the vote total.
For example, lets say your state legislature has 100 representatives. You could require sunset clauses as follows:
51-55 votes: 2 years
56-60 votes: 5 years
61-80 votes: 10 years
81+ votes: No expiration
Then those bills that are narrowly passed would result in a law with a limited shelf-life.
- cmurf 7y agoThis can be done voluntarily in the bill at the time it's written. If you want to make it compulsory, it'd need to be a city charter amendment, a state constitutional amendment, or a federal constitutional amendment. Doing something like this doesn't just magically happen. It's in fact a kind of law that would be much harder to pass than it just being what it is, which is sometimes used and sometimes not used, on a case by case basis.
- function_seven 7y agoSure. I’m not asking for magical intervention here :) It’s a thought experiment to see how our lawmaking might change under such a regime. California’s constitution can be amended by ballot propositions, and it's not too crazy to think that such a prop might pass. I can see a scenario where a city, state, or other political division sees volatility on the horizon, and enacts just a change as a kind of defense against future laws being ossified
- 4ntonius8lock 7y agoI love the experiment. To quote a great song: ...Some things will never change That's just the way it is Ah, but don't you believe them...