4 ms·
That's the beauty of code review, it gets also checked for maintainability and whether it's a code style everybody accepts. It's also possible without code revi
by blablabla123 8y ago
That's the beauty of code review, it gets also checked for maintainability and whether it's a code style everybody accepts. It's also possible without code review but that requires much more things to be in place.
Nothing is more frustrating than a single person pushing code that the other devs don't agree on and do have to fix/maintain actually.
- mirceal 8y agoyeah. the 10x-er usually play the role of wrecking havoc and after that the 0.1x-ers usually clean it up and stabilize it. If you're in that situation you need to get to greener pasture after you've put a reasonable amount of effort into explaining why this is bad + trying to raise awareness
- blablabla123 8y agoNot sure if this matches my definition of 10x-er ;) No, but there is certainly some truth to it, those who routinely push a lot of code tend to be less stringent on following best practices. I think it's smart to keep changesets small but efficient without being neither too pedantic nor too sloppy. After all coding should still be a fun activity, even with all these crazy processes in place...