3 ms·
This is a very good point. Full-causal relationships. With something magic like this, science really will not be happy until it's 10 out of 10. Probably diet,
by dosy 7y ago
This is a very good point. Full-causal relationships. With something magic like this, science really will not be happy until it's 10 out of 10.
Probably diet, pharmacology, genetics, biome, and beliefs are important, but there's no studies. That would be interesting.
I think the human factor also comes into play. Somehow because it's obviously useful, and a human ability, it makes people treat it differently than if we could train a machine or an AI to do it. If there was a psychic AI machine that got 7 out of 10, using some quantum entanglement stuff, everyone would be losing their minds to research and improve it. But as soon as it involves humans, the scholars lose their verve.
- vinceguidry 7y agoI have documented a 2 out of 2 experience that I have had on Quora. I'll link it here: https://www.quora.com/How-does-telekinesis-work-Can-our-brainwaves-move-object/answer/Vincent-Guidry-1 https://www.quora.com/How-does-telekinesis-work-Can-our-brai... The sheer mass of human vagary involved in that account presents a nigh-insurmountable obstacle, especially given that one of my determinations was that "if God doesn't want a thing to happen, it won't happen." That all alone kills any attempt to make it repeatable. I suppose I could get together with a researcher and try to explore the space. But unless we can get to rigor and full repeatability, whose going to care?