Well, the comment was in reply to somebody asking for the postgres feature to be locked down similar to MSSQL's - and I think the "FUD" spreading commenter just

Well, the comment was in reply to somebody asking for the postgres feature to be locked down similar to MSSQL's - and I think the "FUD" spreading commenter just was trying to explain that it's already similarly locked down. Sure, it could have been a bit more explicit about that, but attacking that as FUD seems mighty strong.