I have kind of mixed feeling on that. On one side I kind of see the fascination of looking at a construction that is almost 1000 years old. On the other side wo

I have kind of mixed feeling on that. On one side I kind of see the fascination of looking at a construction that is almost 1000 years old. On the other side wood is wood. If the roof structure is rebuilt identically (and we most likely have enough pictures and blue prints to do so), rationally, does it really matter than the wood is not the original wood (and half of the wood wasn't the original wood anyway, and the spire wasn't the original spire either)?