IMO, the difference is between titles that wouldn't exist without Sony, and titles that Sony paid to have the exclusive for, but it wasn't actually necessary to

IMO, the difference is between titles that wouldn't exist without Sony, and titles that Sony paid to have the exclusive for, but it wasn't actually necessary to have the game exist. I think for the most part that Sony does the former, and I'm fine with that. Epic has been getting a lock of Flack lately for doing the latter. Games that were already on Steam were taken off Steam because Epic paid for exclusivity. That's just scummy, IMO.