10 ms·
I think it was interesting since, as inferred from the article, it look like the same failure as the one from the 737Max
by baud147258 8y ago
I think it was interesting since, as inferred from the article, it look like the same failure as the one from the 737Max
- bcaa7f3a8bbc 8y ago> Investigators concluded that one of its pitot probes used for reading the aircraft's speed and angle of attack (AOA) became blocked, causing the Watchkeeper's onboard flight control logic to enter an erratic series of climbs and dives until it stalled itself and flopped into the sea. Unbelievable!
- lawlessone 8y agoSimilar to how that Tesla car decapitated it's driver a few years ago because it decided a truck trailer was empty sky. The combination of bad software and bad sensor data seems to be lethal.
- porpoisemonkey 8y ago> Similar to how that Tesla car decapitated it's driver a few years ago because it decided a truck trailer was empty sky. This isn't that different from bad biological sensory input that causes a person to think they are stepping on the brake when they're actually stepping on the acceleration pedal. The main differences being that 1) human beings tend to be able to respond to a wider range of scenarios than software and attempt creative problem solving and 2) we have significantly more sensory inputs and they tend to be quite reliable.
- NeedMoreTea 8y agoHuman sensory input fails remarkably quickly if you ever try instrument flying.
- dreamcompiler 8y agoTrue, but in VFR conditions it works quite well. There's no such thing as IFR for cars (yet).