3 ms·
Please have a look at [1] and [2] now
by dosy 7y ago
Please have a look at [1] and [2] now
- scottlocklin 7y agoI quoted something linked in [1] (Huffpo not science either; trash mostly) and I don't think [2] says what you think it says. If there were statistical evidence for "psychic powers," you'd presumably be able to present some. It's not like there aren't enough fruity people out there who REALLY WANT to believe in this sort of thing. By now, after ... literally centuries of people trying this sort of thing, you should have at least one example of unexplained phenomena.
- dosy 7y agothat's weird, I meant [0] and [2] the two papers. And you could be right about 2, I didn't read it yet, just included it to add a paper I found looking for credible results. now, you called people crazy, and if this topic is so overwhelming for you that you're falling back to ignoring facts and calling people crazy names, take a mental health day and come back to it when you're feeling more resilient, instead of projecting onto others. that's not a nice or useful way to discuss. since you said that I think I can point out that you've ignored 0 so far. you seem to want to not believe this, so is 0 the inconvenient truth you're pretending doesn't exist? closing your eyes and hoping reality will go away seems pretty crazy to me. haha. you know that doesn't actually make it disappear, right? Right? I just checked out your WordPress site and you are real scientist. I'm shocked that 1 you don't think there's some sort of quantum underpinnings of this phenomena and 2 you don't want to investigate it. You're an anti establishment guy you seem bitter that your niche research is unappreciated. well, this field quantum physics X psi could be a real fit for you. seriously consider it, I mean it.