4 ms·
I don't need convicing that it is easy to inovate outside of big pharma. Altough bioinformatics startups do require quite a bit more cash then pure software sta
by bioh42_2 16y ago
I don't need convicing that it is easy to inovate outside of big pharma. Altough bioinformatics startups do require quite a bit more cash then pure software startups.
However, the biggest part of capturing value is the regulatory burden.
In other words, lets say you have a great way to discover biomarkers. Even more so, you go ahead and DO discover a pile of biomarkers with great potential.
Then you attemp to sell those biomarkers to big pharma, and that is when you find out:
Even with all their beurocracy and horrible return on R&D investments, big pharma is sitting on a huge pile of biomarkers.
Pushing any one tratment through the pipeline costs a metric tonne of cash and takes 10 year before you even know if it's worth to keep going.
That is why there's a huge backlog of potential drugs, biomarkers, treatments, etc.
Thus merely finding new things with potential is only slighlty better then nothing.
- blakeweb 16y agoAgreed. You've got to address the real problems, or you won't get anywhere.