143 images; and within 95%. I need to read more to work out which 5% is wrong, and what the 95% really means of course. I feel that calling this Pathologist le

143 images; and within 95%. I need to read more to work out which 5% is wrong, and what the 95% really means of course. I feel that calling this Pathologist level could be a stronger claim that I would make. I am hesitant to word things more strongly, but I feel dismay about the kind of claims of performance that are often made in these contexts.