3 ms·
Logically speaking, yes, the cathedrals don’t provide goods and services (in this case, shelter and storage) that are commensurate with their cost. A productive
by i_am_nomad 8y ago
Logically speaking, yes, the cathedrals don’t provide goods and services (in this case, shelter and storage) that are commensurate with their cost. A productive society in theory has no need of them. But we humans are emotional and irrational, and sometimes you need the grandiose and the absurd to motivate us to greatness - there’s just no getting around that.
Similarly, I’d prefer a world without nail salons - logically speaking. To me, they’re pointless and stupidly wasteful, and here in California they’re everywhere. Yet thousands if not millions of people love to have their nails done. It makes them happy and gives them joy in a world that all too often shows its claws. So even if I had the power to banish them, I wouldn’t. I genuinely believe they make the world a better and more productive place. Just like cathedrals.
- ineedasername 8y agoYou have a good point, but I do wonder if we might not be able to have both-- something that is both grandiose & inspiring and also beneficial in a practical way. I think of the Roman aqueducts as an example, or even the Large Hadron Collider as a modern example, or some of the worlds largest sky scrapers as a more visible example. And as I think about it, it's not like the costs to build the Notre Dame cathedral were completely taken out of the economy, they would have gone to pay workers and suppliers that added to the economy, so I suppose I should temper my views with such thoughts.