4 ms·

Definitely a little bizarre, but I could justify it if needed: Atom caters more to the lightweight editor crowd (along with Sublime) VSCode will continue to d

Definitely a little bizarre, but I could justify it if needed: Atom caters more to the lightweight editor crowd (along with Sublime) VSCode will continue to deeply integrate with intellisense and typed languages to become a 'new' Visual Studio. It's more of an IDE (like RubyMine) I find myself wanting VSCode for some specific tasks or projects, but I am not close to considering switching to it as my primary editor.

fermentation 8y ago
VSCode does seem to fit that (increasingly less of a) niche for writing JS with IDE features, but it really feels out-of-place as a C++ IDE.
- richardwhiuk 8y ago
  It's relatively good for Rust.
  - waddlesworth 8y ago
    Yeah, I use Atom for JS and VSCode for Rust.
saagarjha 8y ago
I have found Visual Studio Code to be more lightweight than Atom, resource-wise. Unless you are talking about lightweight in the sense of features?
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- meesles 8y ago
  Resource consumption is less of a concern to me than general 'snappiness'. Since I have a bunch of RAM, go ahead and use it all if I can have a good experience. I don't actually use Atom, though I use Sublime full time. My biggest reason for not being able to use Visual Studio is that all functions, be it fuzzy search, regular text search, navigating tabs, even entering a character carries the load of the VSCode IDE. It must parse each character for chances to present additional information, which is great if that's what you want. Subjectively, I find VSCode too laggy to work at my usual pace.
  - bitwize 8y ago
    Atom is definitely NOT an improvement in that regard. Microsoft optimized the shit out of the parsing bits of VSCode, moving as much as they could into C++ Node extensions for speed and responsiveness. As Electron apps go, VSCode is tense nearly to the point of rupture. Atom has made great strides, but afaik is still not there yet.

fermentation 8y ago

VSCode does seem to fit that (increasingly less of a) niche for writing JS with IDE features, but it really feels out-of-place as a C++ IDE.

richardwhiuk 8y ago
It's relatively good for Rust.
- waddlesworth 8y ago
  Yeah, I use Atom for JS and VSCode for Rust.

saagarjha 8y ago

I have found Visual Studio Code to be more lightweight than Atom, resource-wise. Unless you are talking about lightweight in the sense of features?

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
meesles 8y ago
Resource consumption is less of a concern to me than general 'snappiness'. Since I have a bunch of RAM, go ahead and use it all if I can have a good experience. I don't actually use Atom, though I use Sublime full time. My biggest reason for not being able to use Visual Studio is that all functions, be it fuzzy search, regular text search, navigating tabs, even entering a character carries the load of the VSCode IDE. It must parse each character for chances to present additional information, which is great if that's what you want. Subjectively, I find VSCode too laggy to work at my usual pace.
- bitwize 8y ago
  Atom is definitely NOT an improvement in that regard. Microsoft optimized the shit out of the parsing bits of VSCode, moving as much as they could into C++ Node extensions for speed and responsiveness. As Electron apps go, VSCode is tense nearly to the point of rupture. Atom has made great strides, but afaik is still not there yet.