2 ms·
I used to say the same about the NFL vs cancer research. As in: "Perhaps we should divert all of the money we spend on football each year into cancer research u
by noonespecial 8y ago
I used to say the same about the NFL vs cancer research. As in: "Perhaps we should divert all of the money we spend on football each year into cancer research until we cure it."
The fallacy is that even though both are ostensibly valued in "dollars", at the scale they operate at (society wide), they are not necessarily fungible. You might spend 1 football and get only 0.09 cancer researches. Or they might not be interchangeable at all. I don't have the numbers even to start to make that judgment.
Space is probably just an extreme example of this as it feels "expensive" and seems to directly effect the life of most people very little.
- throw0101a 8y ago> I used to say the same about the NFL vs cancer research. As someone who works in a cancer research-related role, it's nice to not think about work when I leave the office. I would also hazard to guess that many cancer patients enjoy the distraction of various types of entertainment. Now we can certainly do some refocusing, but I would generally hope that as a civilization and species we can talk and chew gum at the same time.