4 ms·
Disney should have bought this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dog%27s_Purpose_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dog%27s_Purpose_(film) (spoilers, of
by jacobush 8y ago
Disney should have bought this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dog%27s_Purpose_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dog%27s_Purpose_(film)
(spoilers, of course)
- sandworm101 8y agoA horrible movie based on an old hollywood trope: The traditional purpose of a dog in a movie is to suffer and die. They are the vehicle for teaching kids about death, a metaphor for human suffering, or to enforce class distinctions as the dog heroically dies defending its betters. This movie just rolls that all together into a series of horrible dog deaths. We see this flipped in pg-13 movies these days where writers, who grew up watching dogs suffer under the old rule, wouldn't dare kill off a dog (independence day, 1 and 2). So the presence of a dog in a scene now reassures the audience that all will be well. But in an R-rated movie... if I see a dog on screen I'm tempted to walk out of the theater because I know it won't end well.
- chlvsl 8y agoits just a dog.