3 ms·
This article is gross. Very one-sided, no attempt to paint an objective picture. If someone did this about a person, it’d be scummy, but about a company it’s ok
by jblow 7y ago
This article is gross. Very one-sided, no attempt to paint an objective picture. If someone did this about a person, it’d be scummy, but about a company it’s okay?
I am sure the company is messed up, but come on.
- empath75 7y agoCompanies aren’t people. I think a lot of people are curious about what happened to HQ trivia, and I think it’s sad that the company seems to be falling apart. (Ps, I think The Witness is one of the best games ever made and everyone should buy it)
- ineedasername 7y agoHQ as a whole and Yusopov in particular refused to comment on the story. Instead it's left with multiple employee accounts. It may be one sided in that it conveys mainly the employee point of view, but when that point of view represents at least half of all employees (more than half signed the letter to oust Yusopov) then it would seem to have a fair bit of credibility.
- m-p-3 7y agoHard to not make it one-sided if the other side is not willing to comment. As long as the article writer gave the other side ample chance to comment, it's on them if they didn't.