3 ms·
> you will get better at recognizing dark skinned people, at the expense of getting worse at recognizing light skinned ones, which generally constitute the majo
by danharaj 8y ago
> you will get better at recognizing dark skinned people, at the expense of getting worse at recognizing light skinned ones, which generally constitute the majority in the real world
Sure, buddy.
- m0zg 8y agoIn the US that's not up for debate. That's why you omitted "in most parts of the US" part of my message, I suppose, to manufacture outrage.
- danharaj 8y agoYou were making a value judgment about optimal utility. That's not a fact. They're just Internet Points, comrade. > I suppose, to manufacture outrage. You're the one who seems outraged =^)
- m0zg 8y agoI made no judgment at all. I explained why the algorithms behave the way they do, and that there's currently no real way to make them behave better on darker skinned people without hurting accuracy overall, assuming the data distribution in the wild is not perfectly balanced, which it is not. That's literally all I said. Whatever you make up in your perfervid imagination is just that, your imagination, comrade.