4 ms·
The computer vision systems could still beat real human vision systems. This could be by absolute numbers crashed into, or by having less bias than humans, or b
by tropo 8y ago
The computer vision systems could still beat real human vision systems. This could be by absolute numbers crashed into, or by having less bias than humans, or by both.
It's not even a bias problem. It's a lighting, contrast, and camo problem. You could as well claim a bias between asphalt and concrete pavement, based on what skin tones are more visible with the pavement as a background.
- externalreality 8y ago> The computer vision systems could still beat real human vision systems. For pattern recognition, No, the computer vision system can't best a human.
- tropo 8y agoI'm not saying it does today. I'm saying it could do so, while still having bias. The existence of bias doesn't make the computer worse than humans.
- deogeo 8y agoBut the entire self-driving system can. It is never tired, or distracted, has far fewer blind spots, and possibly LIDAR and IR to help it.
- scottie_m 8y agoIt can’t today, and until it proves to do so making claims about future tech in relation to present policy is a bad idea.
- int_19h 8y agoSuppose the system does beat real human vision by absolute numbers , but it turns out that it is objectively worse for someone who is not white, and the higher average is because the majority of people in that society are white. Is that acceptable?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]