6 ms·

Was this a particularly popular version? Does this affect a lot of projects?

EduardoBautista 8y ago
The beauty of Ruby is that upgrading Ruby versions is not much of an issue most of the time. Most deprecations are also simple to fix.
- mirceal 8y ago
  most of the time :| anyone remember 1.8 to 1.9 brutal
  - bhaak 8y ago
    No. It wasn't that brutal compared to Rails 2 to 3 that was much more painful :-) But at the time I thought that the transition to 1.9 was handled poorly and took way too long. Little did I know that Python 2.7 would still be supported today.
    - mirceal 8y ago
      hah. try 1.8 -> 1.9 w/ Rails 2-> 3 happening at the same time :))))
      - kawsper 8y ago
        I joined a project that did that, luckily I joined by the end, but I could see the toll it had on the other developers.
- callumjones 8y ago
  I'd disagree with the upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4: > Though ISO/IEC 30170:2012 doesn’t specify details of the Integer class, Ruby had two visible Integer classes: Fixnum and Bignum. Ruby 2.4 unifies them into Integer. All C extensions which touch the Fixnum or Bignum class need to be fixed. https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/12/25/ruby-2-4-0-released/ https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/12/25/ruby-2-4-0-rele...
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - JetSpiegel 8y ago
    How many C extensions does the average Ruby developer maintain?
    - callumjones 8y ago
      The question should be: how many C extensions does the average Ruby developer have in their Gemfile. And my guess would ranging from a few to many.
eikenberry 8y ago
Just as a data point, Ruby 2.3 is the version in the current Debian Stable (Stretch). Debian is currently in a release freeze with 2.5 in Buster, so it won't be this way for long.
- chrisseaton 8y ago
  Why does Debian ship such ludicrously old versions of software?
  - JetSpiegel 8y ago
    > Ruby 2.3.0 was released on Christmas Day in 2015 > Debian 8 (Jessie), released 25–26 April 2015 > Debian 9 (Stretch) was released on 17 June 2017 It was 8 months old when Debian 8 shipped.
    - deleted 8y ago
      [deleted]
    - chrisseaton 8y ago
      > It was 8 months old when Debian 8 shipped I don't know what you're trying to say with that - if it was already 8 months old why wasn't it included? Why are these packages always so old?
      - poloniculmov 8y ago
        > Stable is the current release and targets stable and well-tested software needs.[122] Stable is made by freezing Testing for a few months where bugs are fixed and packages with too many bugs are removed; then the resulting system is released as stable. It is updated only if major security or usability fixes are incorporated. This branch has an optional backports service that provides more recent versions of some software. That's how Debian stable works.
        chrisseaton 8y ago

The beauty of Ruby is that upgrading Ruby versions is not much of an issue most of the time. Most deprecations are also simple to fix.

mirceal 8y ago
most of the time :| anyone remember 1.8 to 1.9 brutal
- bhaak 8y ago
  No. It wasn't that brutal compared to Rails 2 to 3 that was much more painful :-) But at the time I thought that the transition to 1.9 was handled poorly and took way too long. Little did I know that Python 2.7 would still be supported today.
  - mirceal 8y ago
    hah. try 1.8 -> 1.9 w/ Rails 2-> 3 happening at the same time :))))
    - kawsper 8y ago
      I joined a project that did that, luckily I joined by the end, but I could see the toll it had on the other developers.
callumjones 8y ago
I'd disagree with the upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4: > Though ISO/IEC 30170:2012 doesn’t specify details of the Integer class, Ruby had two visible Integer classes: Fixnum and Bignum. Ruby 2.4 unifies them into Integer. All C extensions which touch the Fixnum or Bignum class need to be fixed. https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/12/25/ruby-2-4-0-released/ https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/12/25/ruby-2-4-0-rele...
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- JetSpiegel 8y ago
  How many C extensions does the average Ruby developer maintain?
  - callumjones 8y ago
    The question should be: how many C extensions does the average Ruby developer have in their Gemfile. And my guess would ranging from a few to many.

eikenberry 8y ago

Just as a data point, Ruby 2.3 is the version in the current Debian Stable (Stretch). Debian is currently in a release freeze with 2.5 in Buster, so it won't be this way for long.

chrisseaton 8y ago
Why does Debian ship such ludicrously old versions of software?
- JetSpiegel 8y ago
  > Ruby 2.3.0 was released on Christmas Day in 2015 > Debian 8 (Jessie), released 25–26 April 2015 > Debian 9 (Stretch) was released on 17 June 2017 It was 8 months old when Debian 8 shipped.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - chrisseaton 8y ago
    > It was 8 months old when Debian 8 shipped I don't know what you're trying to say with that - if it was already 8 months old why wasn't it included? Why are these packages always so old?
    - poloniculmov 8y ago
      > Stable is the current release and targets stable and well-tested software needs.[122] Stable is made by freezing Testing for a few months where bugs are fixed and packages with too many bugs are removed; then the resulting system is released as stable. It is updated only if major security or usability fixes are incorporated. This branch has an optional backports service that provides more recent versions of some software. That's how Debian stable works.
      - chrisseaton 8y ago