4 ms·
There is ssh which is secure and encrypted. There is no need to invent new unencrypted and insecure remote shell protocol thus increasing attack surface without
by codedokode 8y ago
There is ssh which is secure and encrypted. There is no need to invent new unencrypted and insecure remote shell protocol thus increasing attack surface without getting any noticeable benefits.
- jakobegger 8y agoHow about not giving people superuser privileges instead of asking for useful features to be dropped?
- minitech 8y agoIt’s not a remote shell protocol, though… it runs local programs.
- pgaddict 8y agoYeah, and it's super-useful in some cases. Say, passing data directly to gzip (or reading it from it).