3 ms·

I agree with you. But that’s called one party consent and this isn’t that. This is a ban on zero party consent, where the manufacturer of a device records remo

by CPLX 8y ago

I agree with you. But that’s called one party consent and this isn’t that. This is a ban on zero party consent, where the manufacturer of a device records remotely without proper notification. That’s another thing entirely.

mikeash 8y ago
Illinois already required two party consent. What would this law have blocked that isn’t already illegal?
- debt 8y ago
  It would’ve allowed you to file complaints with the AG. But Google and Microsoft and Amazon thought that’ll jus lead to too many class action lawsuits lol I guess they’re listening in then
  - mikeash 8y ago
    Surely you can do that anyway? Usually you’re allowed to report suspected crimes.
salawat 8y ago
Wouldn't that just degenerate to one party consent with the manufacturer as the consenting party?