4 ms·
The moderate reasonable interpretation of what you are saying is a solid criticism: misinterpretation is still possible and we don’t have the time to all go to
by afarrell 8y ago
The moderate reasonable interpretation of what you are saying is a solid criticism: misinterpretation is still possible and we don’t have the time to all go to law school and explain what “mens rea” means to each other.
But some level of explicit communication still scales better than silence and implicit expectations.
- luckylion 8y ago> But some level of explicit communication still scales better than silence and implicit expectations. For (very) large groups, certainly, because the amount of effort you put in doesn't really increase with the group size. For small groups I just don't see it. If there is no troublemaker, you don't need a codified system. And if there is a troublemaker, that codified system will be used against you and you will either be forced to disregard your set of rules (why have it in the first place if it's not binding?) to deal with the situation, or watch your group fall apart.