3 ms·
> So lets not get this confused with something good. If I understand your argument, you're saying that, yes, this tool has been used justly so far, but it's st
by asdfasgasdgasdg 8y ago
> So lets not get this confused with something good.
If I understand your argument, you're saying that, yes, this tool has been used justly so far, but it's still not good, because those using it would have behaved unjustly if there were no consequences for just behavior?
I don't really think this argument flies. There are so many other things that have this property and are widely considered to be good things.
- caprese 8y agoIn this context Bad = additional tool state uses to potentially circumvent established rights in an unexpected way, which may result in prior assumptions about established rights becoming obsolete in subsequent court rulings Good = things that dont do that Yes, the consequences are a check on the use of this tool.