4 ms·
So use an ad blocker. It's about thirty seconds to set up, and very user-friendly. Even with the default lists, they do a great job. The reason I take issue
by mises 8y ago
So use an ad blocker. It's about thirty seconds to set up, and very user-friendly. Even with the default lists, they do a great job.
The reason I take issue is the word you used above: "attack". I think its use is telling. The New York Times has broken newsworthy information that was against Facebook, which I think is their job and a good thing to do. Newspapers, however, aren't really supposed to "attack" things. This is part of the reason there is such distrust in the media; many news publications are indeed attacking various things and not even trying to hide it.
- Nextgrid 8y agoSo following your logic the solution to knife crime would be to tell everyone to wear armor instead of putting the criminals in jail? > Newspapers, however, aren't really supposed to "attack" things I would consider it an attack if they were publishing lies. But I don't see any lies here - Facebook has dug their own grave and is now rightfully getting what they deserve.
- ThomPete 8y agoIs Facebook comitting a crime? Not sure i understand your analogy.
- Nextgrid 8y agoFacebook is actually trying to fight a fine from Belgium's privacy regulator, so they definitely committed a crime, at least there: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/15/belgium-facebook-court-privacy-breaches-ads https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/15/belgium-f... My analogy was that it shouldn't be up to me to defend myself from someone else's nefarious actions. I should not have to install ad blockers to avoid getting stalked by Facebook.
- ThomPete 8y agoBut you havent explained the crime yet.
- username223 8y ago> So use an ad blocker. It's about thirty seconds to set up, and very user-friendly. Even with the default lists, they do a great job. Have you ever tried to set up ad/tracker blocking for a non-tech person? If it actually protects their privacy, then it's also a huge pain in the ass that randomly breaks things and requires constant attention. DNS- or IP-level blocking works best, but requires constant maintenance. Then there are the various caches. What breaks when you block "*.googleapis.com"? Then there's the question of which user-hostile JavaScript APIs you try to block. WebGL? WebUSB? And from whom? It's endless war.