3 ms·
Maybe because it can make more money providing high-speed rail which a few people want for a high price. The article does address the difficulty of competition
by ramshorns 8y ago
Maybe because it can make more money providing high-speed rail which a few people want for a high price. The article does address the difficulty of competition (either between companies or within a nationalised rail provider) because tracks are one-dimensional, so maybe the rail provider has to choose between low speed and high speed.