> Lack of comments json5 to the rescue: https://json5.org/ https://json5.org/ > It’s just not that readable. Sure, it’s readable for a data-interchange format

> Lack of comments json5 to the rescue: https://json5.org/ https://json5.org/ > It’s just not that readable. Sure, it’s readable for a data-interchange format, but not readable for a configuration file. I'm of the opposite opinion. I find json to be the easiest to read, as opposed to yml and xml.