3 ms·
I like standard Emacs better than Aquamacs, too. I can see the appeal of Aquamacs to people who were Mac users first, and Emacs users later, but I'm the other w
by dhess 16y ago
I like standard Emacs better than Aquamacs, too. I can see the appeal
of Aquamacs to people who were Mac users first, and Emacs users later,
but I'm the other way round. For my tastes, Aquamacs is trying a bit
too hard to be Mac-like, and is just different enough from Emacs to be
maddening to use. I used it for about a year and half before I
switched to standard Emacs, and I'm much happier since. Bundling a
bunch of apparently randomly-selected extra modes was the thing I
liked least about Aquamacs, but there were lots of other irritating
features, not to mention various incompatibilities with my familiar
Emacs configuration.
For the past few months, I've been running Yamamoto Mitsuharu's
experimental "Mac port" of standard Emacs. Probably the only way you'd
know about it is if you read the emacs-dev mailing list. Mitsuharu-san
has taken some of the best features of the old Carbon Emacs (which
many people still run, apparently!), along with a few new ones, and
ported them to Emacs 23 to make a hybrid Cocoa/Carbon app. Among the
extra features are smoother scrolling, support for gestures on the
Magic Trackpad/Magic Mouse, integration with Services on Mac OS X
10.6, and support for Emacs as the default mailer for mailto: links
(yes!).
Mitsuharu-san's changes aren't yet integrated into mainline Emacs, but
he publishes regular patches against it. He claims it's still an
experimental port; however, I've only encountered one bug in the 5 or 6
months I've been using it, which he promptly fixed once I reported
it. It's a pain to build, but if you use Homebrew, my emacs-mac-port
branch on Github has support for it: just do
brew install emacs --with-mac
https://github.com/dhess/homebrew/tree/emacs-mac-port https://github.com/dhess/homebrew/tree/emacs-mac-port