6 ms·
Foreign? Why? I didn't see any indication of that in the article, beyond what could be regular typos. And it's not like the US doesn't have its own fair share o
by black_puppydog 8y ago
Foreign? Why? I didn't see any indication of that in the article, beyond what could be regular typos. And it's not like the US doesn't have its own fair share of disgruntled and/or greedy people capable of something like this.
- djhaskin987 8y agoNo one says "over a million data" in English, though it is arguably grammatically correct. Together with the typos it strongly suggests a foreign speaker.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- caprese 8y ago> I didn't see any indication of that in the article, beyond what could be regular typos part of standard OPSEC is to run your typing through an anonimyzer tool. Hm thats not the colloquial names of those tools Basically something to reduce the fingerprinting of how you write. Often times it makes you seem to have bad grammar, but some of the tools can intentionally give you the profile of a Russian person that learned English as a second language. gives you an easy scapegoat to get away with the hacking, and gives the investigators an easy scapegoat to mask their incompetence