5 ms·
I agree that it seemed to have this "I'm smarter than you" vibe, but the only reason I half-agreed is that I feel like it takes some nerve to try to name your d
by andolanra 16y ago
I agree that it seemed to have this "I'm smarter than you" vibe, but the only reason I half-agreed is that I feel like it takes some nerve to try to name your discovery after yourself. It wouldn't be so bad if she called it the "curve-approximation method" or something like that; but coming up with something and deciding to name it after yourself feels kind of presumptuous and not exceptionally helpful to boot. (As far as I know, most concepts and ideas named after people weren't self-named; Dijkstra, arrogant as he was, published "A note on two problems in connexion with graphs," and never mentioned "Dijkstra's algorithm.")
- Vivtek 16y agoEverything in medicine is named with arbitrary names of discoverers and so on. That's why you have to be good at rote memorization to get through med school - you can't even communicate with your colleagues otherwise. This is a fundamental cultural difference between medicine and engineering.