4 ms·
Maybe Nicotine rather than Alcohol would have been better for his point. But I'd still trust Joe to drive the forklift after a cup of coffee and cigarette than
by dugditches 8y ago
Maybe Nicotine rather than Alcohol would have been better for his point.
But I'd still trust Joe to drive the forklift after a cup of coffee and cigarette than a drink and a doob.
- DKnoll 8y agoPersonally I would consider caffeine more impairing than nicotine but I don't think either are a big concern as far as impairment goes. Impairment on those substances is probably best handled in law with the same general, hand-wavey subsections as drinking too much water or eating too much Taco Bell.
- danlugo92 8y agoAren't stimulants the opposite of impairing? :shrugs:
- gnulinux 8y agoWould you not consider someone high on meth intoxicated? I think stimulants are clearly intoxicating too. Culturally, we're comfortable people doing their jobs right high on caffeine but unless you make a scientific study you cannot know whether that's the case. It's possible caffeine slightly impairs your ability use a vehicle, or maybe enhances it, or maybe it has no effect.